Home Page - About the Arthritis Center -Hopkins Rheumatology - Myositis Center - Vasculitis Center - Scleroderma Center
Search for:



















2004 Eular Highlights Banner
RA treatments
 CTLA4Ig

OP0104 EFFICACY OF ABATACEPT (CTLA4Ig; BMS-188667) IN COMBINATION WITH METHOTREXATE IN THE TREATMENT OF EARLY AND ESTABLISHED RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS
E. Keystone, J. Sibilia, S. Steinfeld, I. Nuamah, R. Aranda, J. Becker

Abatacept, also known as CTLA4g, blocks a co-stimulatory signal required for T cell activation. Earlier studies (see Eular 2002 highlights) have shown that CTLA4Ig appears to be well tolerated and efficacious in patients with active RA receiving methotrexate (MTX). Here, Keystone et al compare ACR responses of patients receiving combination therapy of abatacept plus MTX to patients receiving MTX alone. Response rates are also compared based on disease duration.

Methods: Patients with active rheumatoid arthritis (RA) despite MTX with similar demographics were randomized to one of two treatment groups, abatacept 10m/kg + MTX (n=115) or MTX alone (n=119). ACR20, 50, and 70 are measured following 12 months of therapy.

Results: A statistically significantly greater proportion of patients in the abatacept + MTX group achieved ACR 20, 50 and 70 responses at 12 months compared with MTX alone (ACR 20: 63 vs 36%, p<0.001; ACR 50: 42 vs 20%, p<0.001; ACR 70: 21 vs 8%, p<0.05). Additionally, a greater percentage of patients in the abatacept + MTX group with disease duration < 3 years (n=41) achieved ACR20, 50, and 70 compared to patients with disease duration > 3 years (n=74), although this difference did not reach statistical significance.

Conclusion: In patients with RA, combination therapy with abatacept + MTX is significantly more efficacious than therapy with MTX alone. There was a trend suggesting greater improvement in ACR response rates in patients with shorter disease duration.

Editorial Comments: As with all other biologics tested to date, abatacept in combination with MTX is more effective than MTX alone. The critical missing piece of information is what happens to radiographic progression in the 2 groups.

Also, although the ACR responses in the "early" RA group were higher than those with longer duration RA, so were the corresponding placebo responses. If one subtracts the placebo responses from the treatment responses, the differencs in the early versus late RA groups are nearly identical as shown below.

Disease < 3 years
Abatacept + MTX PLC + MTX Δ
ACR 20 70.7% 45.0% 25%
ACR 50 46.3% 27.5% 19%
ACR 70 24.4% 7.5% 17%
Disease > 3 years
Abatacept + MTX PLC + MTX Δ
ACR 20 58.1% 31.6% 27%
ACR 50 39.2% 16.5% 23%
ACR 70 18.9% 7.6% 11%

((top of page)) (next page)

All information contained within the Johns Hopkins Arthritis Center website is intended for educational purposes only. Physicians and other health care professionals are encouraged to consult other sources and confirm the information contained within this site. Consumers should never disregard medical advice or delay in seeking it because of something they may have read on this website.